NikonGear'23

Images => Life, the Universe & Everything Else => Topic started by: Fons Baerken on June 24, 2015, 14:35:19

Title: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 24, 2015, 14:35:19

1
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/283/18487524584_41550b3f1e_b.jpg)

2
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/525/19104377602_53c26951cb_b.jpg)

3
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/296/19114553465_2c255e481a_b.jpg)

4
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/341/18493920703_9be38bb2ca_b.jpg)

5
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/501/18492039154_c2a4f5232f_b.jpg)

6
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/479/19088416756_bd978d39be_b.jpg)

IR D60 715nm 18-200mm /vr
thank you Chris Wahl

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 24, 2015, 20:30:21

7
(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3911/19117493862_b16be4a8a4_b.jpg)

8
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/496/19123183025_77f62b429d_b.jpg)

9
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/543/18935573938_b50112925d_b.jpg)

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 25, 2015, 20:51:23

10
(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3810/18531349804_3709e01ec9_b.jpg)

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 25, 2015, 23:15:20

(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/375/19157129725_641390f157_b.jpg)

(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/422/19151349052_9af7f7db8c_b.jpg)

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 26, 2015, 07:44:18

Very surprised to see no interest for this

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Jørgen Ramskov on June 26, 2015, 10:31:29

I like the colors of #2, not so much the rest of the PP of that image. #4 is the highlight for me, the colors you've used works really well.

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 26, 2015, 11:00:46

Thank you my first true excursion into the ir realm, ...

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: knb on June 26, 2015, 12:42:50

Extremly bright colours in the first one (in the first set), but still I find it a pleasing look. The second looks very interesting, though perhaps with a bit much distortion for my liking.

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on June 26, 2015, 13:05:48

Getting IR to work for you is not achieved instantaneously . There is just one realistic approach over time: try, and try again.

Yo make the matters more complex by combining IR with pretty heavy data shifting. This is like climbing out on a thin limb and it might snap. Not that I am firmly set against advanced processing, so far from that, but the processing must follow an idea made before the shot actually was captured to give a true photo.

It'll all come together in due time. Don't stop.

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 27, 2015, 07:53:38

Thank you for your insights, Bjørn.

(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/282/18559572684_a94208cc29_b.jpg[url][/url])

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 29, 2015, 19:28:28

14
(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/536/19076558109_6092089bb2_b.jpg)

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Bjørn Rørslett on June 30, 2015, 13:46:23

Now you are getting somewhere ...

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on June 30, 2015, 16:59:16

thank you Bjørn

(https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3892/18674530693_b976fbe212_b.jpg)

(https://farm1.staticflickr.com/306/19108984939_8e3c0f3ace_b.jpg)

have been using the sigma 15mm f/2.8 n/ai fisheye on the ir-d60

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Peter Forsell on September 08, 2015, 18:19:54

#14 is superb. Sorry I am late to the thread.

Peter

Title: Re: more ir
Post by: Fons Baerken on September 08, 2015, 20:11:22

Quote from: pforsell on September 08, 2015, 18:19:54

#14 is superb. Sorry I am late to the thread.

Peter

thank you Peter