NikonGear'23
Images => Nature, Flora, Fauna & Landscapes => Topic started by: Fons Baerken on October 06, 2015, 11:33:20
-
1
(https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5617/21963564846_232c2a7f85_b.jpg)
-
where there is a difference
2
(https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5721/21999583721_35cc3b4eb9_b.jpg)
-
3
(https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/763/21978253692_dcde43a3b8_b.jpg)
-
Yes. I thought you lost it. But now. This is the proof. Great shots.
-
I love the second one. But pray tell, what lens did you use?
-
Yes. I thought you lost it. But now. This is the proof. Great shots.
lost what Frank :D
I love the second one. But pray tell, what lens did you use?
the nikkor 35mm f/1.4 ais one of my favourite nikkors
the 2nd is a colourshift from the first and shot wide open
and increasing micro contrast
to give that disturbing bokeh
which i like in this case
-
I don't think the bokeh is disturbing. My immediate reaction was "looks like rain drops" and that adds to the dreary feeling. Excellent work.
Btw how did you create that "light leak" effect in the third one?
-
I don't think the bokeh is disturbing. My immediate reaction was "looks like rain drops" and that adds to the dreary feeling. Excellent work.
Btw how did you create that "light leak" effect in the third one?
double exposure
-
Tour de force. Especially #1, for me.
-
very, very convincing. The old 35/1.4 is really the other bokeh speciality lens, together with the 50/1.2
-
I really like #1
-
Tour de force. Especially #1, for me.
I really like #1
very, very convincing. The old 35/1.4 is really the other bokeh speciality lens, together with the 50/1.2
thank you for the comments
-
I am grabbing my jacket after viewing #1.
-
I am grabbing my jacket after viewing #1.
temps are really not that bad..still :)