NikonGear'23

Images => People, Portraits, Street, PJ & Cityscapes => Topic started by: Peter Connan on August 29, 2015, 15:02:39

Title: Mustang Sally
Post by: Peter Connan on August 29, 2015, 15:02:39

This, to me, remains the most beautiful sound in the world...

2 and a quarter litres in each of twelve cylinders, fed by supercharger and with the exhausts cut off.

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Hugh_3170 on August 29, 2015, 15:32:41

I can't argue with your assessment re the P51's sound.  Moreover, the P51 is also the most beautiful WWII fighter IMHO.

The image most realistically portrays the plane in flight - if only the machine guns were firing.  (On the other hand if the machine guns were firing we may not have you with us any longer, so I guess we cannot have everything!  ;D)

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Somnath Goswami on August 29, 2015, 15:48:42

a fine shot. The watermark cutting the wing is a bit of downer :-)

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Gary on August 29, 2015, 18:00:32

Nicely done, perfect prop blur on a perfect plane.

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Peter Connan on August 30, 2015, 09:07:34

Thank you Gentlemen

Somnath, thank you. I am a bit ambivalent about watermarks. On the one hand, they do deface the photo, but on the other, if they do not cut across some part of the subject, they are so easily removed. However, perhaps I need to develop a few more pre-sets with the watermark in different locations.

Hugh, I must be honest, I like the Spittie even more. But we have no flying examples of those left here.

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Gary on August 30, 2015, 18:15:53

You know Peter, there are places that will take you up in a P-51. (Check out Planes of Fame.) I dunno about the Spittie.

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Peter Connan on August 31, 2015, 06:16:45

Thanks Gary.

However, it seems that even in the land of the free this is now illegal. They are apparently allying for a waiver, but it is subject to a public vote...

There are places here in SA where one can get a flight in certain vintage aircraft, but nothing as exotic as a Spittie or a Mustang, best I could hope for is a T6, Tiger Moth or maybe a Pitts Special. However, even these are at a price I am not prepared to pay. So I guess I will keep on taking photos and dreaming. But since I suffer from air-sickness, probably the dream is better than the reality...

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Erik Lund on August 31, 2015, 10:38:21

Very nice capture!
IMHO there can be no doubt that the Supermarine Spitfire is the most beautifull airplane out of WWII - with the sound of the Rolls-Royce Merlin V12 it is as sweet as it gets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5rGyP6SSYM

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Erik Lund on August 31, 2015, 11:05:36

Here is BTW an epic capture of a Low Pass
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iOoiEbtf2w

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Jørgen Ramskov on August 31, 2015, 15:45:29

That's a cracking good picture!

Erik: Wow!

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Peter Connan on August 31, 2015, 17:20:14

Now THAT's a low pass! Thanks Eric and Jorgen.

This is one area where DSLR video is not yet good enough (or I am not good enough at using it). I tried filming a couple of passes, but with the sun on the LCD, I just couldn't keep it in sight.

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Sash on August 31, 2015, 21:05:23

Quote from: Peter Connan on August 30, 2015, 09:07:34

I am a bit ambivalent about watermarks. On the one hand, they do deface the photo, but on the other, if they do not cut across some part of the subject, they are so easily removed. However, perhaps I need to develop a few more pre-sets with the watermark in different locations.

Just to solve your dilemma. It took me literally 10 seconds to remove your sig, it is super easy. It does not matter if it cuts across the subject or not. You can do it much more cleanly if you take more time. Something like 5 minutes :)

Title: Re: Mustang Sally
Post by: Peter Connan on September 01, 2015, 19:18:19

Thanks for proving a point Sash.
Guess that proves the whole process is virtually useless.