Author Topic: more ir  (Read 2527 times)

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
more ir
« on: June 24, 2015, 14:35:19 »
1


2


3


4


5


6


IR D60 715nm 18-200mm /vr
thank you Chris Wahl

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2015, 20:30:21 »
7


8


9

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2015, 20:51:23 »
10

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2015, 23:15:20 »



Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2015, 07:44:18 »
Very surprised to see no interest for this

Jørgen Ramskov

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 1103
  • Aarhus, Denmark
Re: more ir
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2015, 10:31:29 »
I like the colors of #2, not so much the rest of the PP of that image. #4 is the highlight for me, the colors you've used works really well.
Jørgen Ramskov

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2015, 11:00:46 »
Thank you my first true excursion into the ir realm, ...

knb

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 110
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: more ir
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2015, 12:42:50 »
Extremly bright colours in the first one (in the first set), but still I find it a pleasing look. The second looks very interesting, though perhaps with a bit much distortion for my liking.
Kjetil Narum Bakken

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: more ir
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2015, 13:05:48 »
Getting IR to work for you is not achieved instantaneously . There is just one realistic approach over time: try, and try again.

Yo make the matters more complex by combining IR with pretty heavy data shifting. This is like climbing out on a thin limb and it might snap. Not that I am firmly set against advanced processing, so far from that, but the processing must follow an idea made before the shot actually was captured to give a true photo.

It'll all come together in due time. Don't stop.

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2015, 07:53:38 »
Thank you for your insights, Bjørn.


Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2015, 19:28:28 »
14

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: more ir
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2015, 13:46:23 »
Now you are getting somewhere ...

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2015, 16:59:16 »
thank you Bjørn





have been using the sigma 15mm f/2.8 n/ai fisheye on the ir-d60

Peter Forsell

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 425
  • A Cunning Linguist
Re: more ir
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2015, 18:19:54 »
#14 is superb. Sorry I am late to the thread.

Peter

Fons Baerken

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 10642
    • https://www.flickr.com/photos/fonsbaerken/
Re: more ir
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2015, 20:11:22 »
#14 is superb. Sorry I am late to the thread.

Peter

thank you Peter