Author Topic: Focal comparison 16-200mm  (Read 4143 times)

Andy

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 314
Focal comparison 16-200mm
« on: March 17, 2016, 00:04:39 »
Nice comparison how lenses with different focal lengths project the 3d space into an 2d image plane
http://giphy.com/gifs/lens-focal-comparsion-l2JJu55Y2LSvkbBqo

Andy

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2016, 00:14:31 »
Or, impact of perspectives.

Andy

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 314
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2016, 00:23:25 »
Correct :)

I just read Haruo Sato's article about the future of lens design at Nikon and he used the 3d/2d description what lenses actually do.
http://www.nikkor.com/technology/02.html

Jakov Minić

  • Jakov Minic
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 5354
  • The Hague, The Netherlands
    • Jakov Minić
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2016, 00:52:07 »
Andy, what a wonderful article. Thank you for sharing it with us!
Free your mind and your ass will follow. - George Clinton
Before I jump like monkey give me banana. - Fela Kuti
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem. - Woody Allen

JJChan

  • JJ Chan
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 300
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2016, 14:18:07 »
I just read Haruo Sato's article about the future of lens design at Nikon and he used the 3d/2d description what lenses actually do.
http://www.nikkor.com/technology/02.html

Andy
Thanks for the link.

Sato: 'We created a lens that is extremely capable in regards to creating point images on point, one of the key ideas of the Noct-NIKKOR design.'

Here is shot at medium to long distances with Noct showing this effect. I'm not sure how the new AFS58mm would render this but I think that this effect is what he is referring to?

JJ

Frank Fremerey

  • engineering art
  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 12580
  • Bonn, Germany
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2016, 15:17:58 »
Sat0's article makes me want to own one of these. I also want to buy a 45 PC an I already got some lenses in the 50/60 domain. I hope I do not end as a collector...
You are out there. You and your camera. You can shoot or not shoot as you please. Discover the world, Your world. Show it to us. Or we might never see it.

Me: https://youpic.com/photographer/frankfremerey/

Jakov Minić

  • Jakov Minic
  • Global Moderator
  • **
  • Posts: 5354
  • The Hague, The Netherlands
    • Jakov Minić
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2016, 17:09:29 »
I am extremely sorry that Mr Koichi Ohshita is not developing F-mount lenses any longer because the two that he did develop the 85/1.4D and the 45/2.8P are my favorite ones.
Free your mind and your ass will follow. - George Clinton
Before I jump like monkey give me banana. - Fela Kuti
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem. - Woody Allen

Jørgen Ramskov

  • NG Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1103
  • Aarhus, Denmark
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2016, 17:23:38 »
Nice gif, quite a big difference it makes.
Jørgen Ramskov

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2016, 18:05:02 »
Please observe what is shown is actually the influence of perspective, not focal lengths per se.

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 369
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2016, 18:55:07 »
Bjorn, can you explain your comment re perspective?  I thought perspective remained the same when changing focal length. 

Bjørn Rørslett

  • Fierce Bear of the North
  • Administrator
  • ***
  • Posts: 8252
  • Oslo, Norway
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2016, 19:23:45 »
Here the person is depicted at the same size for each focal length. Thus camera has moved and accordingly, perspective is changed.

If the camera standpoint remains unchanged, perspective of course also is constant. However, in that case, detail magnification is proportional to focal length.

Chip Chipowski

  • NG Supporter
  • **
  • Posts: 369
  • You ARE NikonGear
Re: Focal comparison 16-200mm
« Reply #11 on: March 17, 2016, 19:38:51 »
Aha - thanks for the explanation!